This website’s original language is English. For translation, click the globe icon or choose Translate in the menu.
156 matching records found
While all the 28 villages under Kotia Gram Panchayat remain in Odisha territory, Andhra Pradesh has been claiming its rights over 21 villages. Odisha challenged this in the Supreme Court in 1968 and the court asked both States to maintain the status quo in 2006
The judgment by a Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu said the law does not insist that only public servants or competent authorities were eligible to lodge complaints against electoral candidates
Alleging that party candidates continue to face obstruction during filing of nominations, they lodge complaint with State Election Commissioner seeking urgent intervention
Campaigners plan mass Halloween action before Supreme Court hearing on challenge to group's 'terrorist' proscription.
Releasing a book of evidence photographs, the YSRCP president Jagan Mohan Reddy alleges torn nomination papers, forged withdrawal letters and attacks on the party’s candidates
The Supreme Court has asked the State Election Commission to decide where candidates were unable to file nominations
US federal judge blocked wall's construction on Texas-Mexico border amid an ongoing legal battle.
The comments of the opposition party leaders on the Supreme Court verdict reflects their litigant mindset, observes the TDP national president and Chief Minister, while exhorting the party MLAs, MPs, candidates and booth-level activists to work for the victory of the alliance candidates
The Supreme Court clarifies that non-Hindu communities can be OBC, but distinguishes between the sources of backwardness for Hindu OBCs and non-Hindu OBCs on the question of continuing backwardness for converts
Dismissing the opposition party’s claim that the court reprimanded the State Election Commission, the TDP legal cell says the court mandated the election body to take a decision on giving aggrieved candidates extra time for filing nominations by the end of October 22 based on merits of the complaints and evidence it has
The Supreme Court clarified that it had made no observations on the merits of the FIR. It also refrained from expressing any opinion on the validity of a subsequent Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered against the petitioners
A Procuradoria-Geral da República (PGR) enviou nesta segunda-feira (19) ao Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) um parecer contrário ao pedido para investigar o ministro André Mendonça por abuso de autoridade. A manifestação foi solicitada pelo presidente do Supremo, Edson Fachin, após o ministro Alexandre de Moraes pedir que Mendonça seja investigado por pedir a abertura de uma investigação contra ele. Moraes foi citado em conversas com o ex-banqueiro Daniel Vorcaro. Notícias relacionadas:Mendonça acusa Moraes de direcionar investigação no STF.Na manifestação, o procurador-geral da República, Paulo Gonet, diz que o pedido de investigação contra o colega não pode ser considerado crime. "A representação, contudo, não parece demonstrar que a conduta possa ser reconduzida a ato punido por algum tipo da Lei n. 13.869/2019, a Lei de Abuso de Autoridade, que é o tema que cabe examinar neste momento", afirmou. Gonet também disse que os relatórios solicitados por Mendonça à Polícia Federal (PF) para embasar o pedido de investigação contra Moraes não podem ser considerados como prova. "Os próprios relatórios contêm advertência de que não possuem valor probatório, não sendo peça de instrução. Não podem ser considerados provas ilícitas, até porque provas não são", completou. O caso Moraes veio à tona no dia 1° de setembro, quando André Mendonça, relator do caso Master, retirou o sigilo do caso e encaminhou as conversas para Fachin. A investigação da PF apontou que Vorcaro trocou cerca de 50 mensagens com número atribuído a Alexandre de Moraes antes de ser preso, em 17 de novembro do ano passado. Mendonça foi acusado por Alexandre de Moraes de atuar de forma parcial na condução das investigações para incriminá-lo.
O ministro do Supremo Tribunal Federal Cristiano Zanin pediu nesta segunda-feira (19) a manifestação da Procuradoria-Geral da República (PGR) e da Advocacia-Geral da União (AGU) sobre a ação que pede a realização de segundo turno para governador do estado do Rio de Janeiro. Com a decisão, os órgãos terão prazo de cinco dias para enviar um parecer ao Supremo. O Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE) também será ouvido. Notícias relacionadas:Ato em apoio à democracia e a Lula reúne milhares no Rio e Brasília.Zanin vai relatar novo pedido do PSD por segundo turno no Rio.TRE-RJ proclama Douglas Ruas eleito para o governo do Rio de Janeiro.Zanin é relator da ação na qual o PSD, partido do candidato Eduardo Paes, pretende suspender a decisão do TSE que anulou os votos obtidos pelo candidato Anthony Garotinho (Republicanos) e determinou a retotalização dos votos para o cargo de governador do Rio de Janeiro. A medida permitiu a eleição de Douglas Ruas (PL) no primeiro turno, por ter passado de 49,27% para 50,88% dos votos válidos. Para o PSD, a realização de segundo turno deve depender exclusivamente dos votos dos eleitores, não de “eventos processuais”. “A interpretação impugnada, contudo, mantém aberta outra via para o mesmo resultado: quem sabe que terá o registro negado pode manter-se na urna, captar votos e aguardar que a anulação definitiva retire esses votos da base”, argumenta o partido. Após receber as manifestações, o relator deve decidir a questão. Em outra ação sobre o caso, Zanin já negou pedido da campanha de Paes para suspender a decisão do TSE que levou à vitória de Ruas no primeiro turno.
On July 7, the high court upheld the death sentences of 38 operatives of terror outfit Indian Mujahideen in the serial-bomb-blasts case
The significant observation was made by a Bench of Justices S.V.N. Bhatti and N.V. Anjaria in its judgment delivered on October 16
For the overwhelming majority of households, the fee payable for a professional course constitutes a substantial part of the family’s income and savings, the court observes
The Bench said that on September 1, it had directed the States and UTs to take into consideration the deficiencies highlighted by it and report in that regard by the next date of hearing
The MHA said that priority will be given to matters pertaining to the use of pellet guns, targeted violence, harassment of female protestors, and excessive violence and destruction of property occasioned on either side
The court took a practical view that children did not cease to use the internet merely because the law prohibits them from doing so; it also stated their observations were not against age-based online restrictions
The controversy in the case of Secretary to Government versus Sameer Ahamed N. began with a man, born to Hindu parents in 1993 at Thoothukudi district in Tamil Nadu, voluntarily converting to Islam in September 2015
Honduras' Supreme Court named two judges on 16 October for ex-president Hernández's migration alert and a corruption file; no ruling yet. The post Honduras Sends Hernández Alert to 2 Judges appeared first on The Rio Times.
The MAITC MP had approached the top court seeking guidelines to ensure cooperation from local authorities and the police during visits to her constituency
The apex court stays the trial proceedings while noting that the bail applications filed by the husband and the mother-in-law will be decided within two weeks.
SCBA President and senior advocate Pradeep Rai alleged that the remarks by Mr. Raut and Mr. Wagle went beyond the bounds of fair criticism and were capable of undermining public confidence in the Supreme Court
The top court had directed that no coercive action be taken against a woman journalist, against whom a case has been filed by a Delhi Police officer alleging casteist remarks and public humiliation against him during a protest near the Jantar Mantar
Brazil's Supreme Court ruled 6 to 5 that a social-security levy on farm sales was unconstitutional before 2018, a decision that reaches meatpackers. The post Brazil Top Court Voids Farm Pension Levy appeared first on The Rio Times.
A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi deferred the matter after Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju informed it that a reply has been filed in the matter
The party accuses Rahul Gandhi and his allies of using “mob pressure to intimidate the judiciary”
Court issues notice in all petitions, including one by the Opposition bloc against the CEC/SIR, and the denotification of Jantar Mantar as a protest site
“Social backwardness does not arise in a day or a generation. It is the result of a social system built over thousands of years. Conversion to another religion does not erase it,” he said in a statement